AYMI × Cell Thesis Creative preview →
Expanded Marketing Proposal · July 8, 2026 · For Roman Khattak

Three clinics.
One thesis.

The rebrand is the visible part. The real work is turning three separate operations into one measurable growth system — and doing it before the pixels forget what they knew.

Brand — Cell Thesis Category — Longevity & Aesthetics Markets — Midtown · UES · Brooklyn Sender — Mike, Founder, AYMI
§01 · CEO Summary

Five things, if you only read one page.

01

You aren't launching a new business. You're clarifying one you already run. Cell Thesis isn't a paint job on Manhattan Laser — it's the argument for why three surfaces belong under one roof.

02

The pixels, ad accounts, and reviews already have equity. Migrated correctly, they compound. Migrated hastily, you start from zero on all three.

03

Your first ninety days aren't a launch — they're a measurement build. The ROI dashboard, GHL activation, and lifecycle engine you named are the three legs. We sequence them so nothing falls over.

04

Longevity buyers behave differently than laser buyers. Higher intent, longer consideration, higher LTV. The consolidation lets you monetize both without cannibalizing.

05

Recommendation: Growth System ★ — one strategist, an AI-monitored dashboard, paid acquisition, and the migration playbook. The tier is priced for scoping; we hold that number for the call.

§02 · Cliff Notes

Ten lines. One thesis.

01
The rebrand is the vehicle. The consolidation is the point.
02
Manhattan Laser has three locations and one holding entity. Cell Thesis should ship as one brand with three doors — not three brands in a trench coat.
03
Migrate pixels before the domain flip. Every day of delay bleeds audience.
04
GHL is set up. It isn't wired. Every booking without an attribution ID is a ghost in the dashboard.
05
Meta already runs; Google is the gap. Local intent for laser and injectables is largely uncaptured.
06
Longevity buyers convert on trust and clinical credibility. Laser buyers convert on price and location. Design for both, don't average them.
07
Lifecycle is where the aesthetic model finally becomes a subscription — treatment cycles, replenishment, memberships.
08
Three GBPs, one review strategy, one appointment funnel. Otherwise the Brooklyn location keeps losing to a Bay Ridge review page you don't control.
09
Ninety days from today: growth ROI dashboard live, pixels re-attributed, welcome + retention flows firing.
10
Recommendation: Growth System ★ — the middle tier is right-sized for a three-location consolidation with paid + lifecycle in flight.
§03 · Table of Contents

Twenty sections. Read in order.

§04 · The Reframe

You didn't run three clinics. You ran one system with three surfaces.

The clarifying question isn't what to call the new brand. It's which parts of the old operation were carrying weight — the location count, the founder credibility, the treatment mix, the review stack — and which parts were quietly duplicating themselves across three domains, three inboxes, and three receipts.

Cell Thesis is the name for what happens when you stop paying for three of everything. One booking funnel, one lifecycle engine, one measurement layer, one brand — with three doors that route the same patient into the same care journey. The rebrand is downstream of that decision. Not the other way around.

Two things go from asset to liability the moment the domain flips: the pixels (Meta, Google, and any warmed CAPI audience segments that live under Manhattan Laser's Business Manager), and the reviews (three separate Google Business Profiles carrying the goodwill of two years of care). Both are recoverable. Neither is automatic. Either can be silently vaporized by a fast domain redirect and a slow ad-account migration.

That's the actual work of the first ninety days. Not the launch. The preservation.

§05 · Where you are vs. where this takes you

The consolidation, on eight axes.

AxisToday · Three clinicsNinety days · Cell Thesis
Brand identity Manhattan Laser — three URLs, three Google Business Profiles, one Instagram doing the work of all three. Cell Thesis — one brand register that reads longevity + aesthetics, three location pages that all inherit the same authority.
Attribution Bookings live in GHL. Ad spend lives in Meta. Nothing joins them without hand-matching phone numbers. One dashboard. Ad → click → session → booking → shown → treatment cycle → LTV. Named source per booking, per location.
Pixel & audience assets Meta pixel warmed under manhattan-laser.com. Roughly 24 months of visit and event history. At risk in a domain flip. Pixel re-parented to cellthesis.com without losing the event history. Custom audiences preserved; new source labels appended, not replaced.
Reviews Three GBPs at 4-star tiers. Two years of patient reviews you own but can't merge. Bay Ridge is quietly leading; Midtown is quietly lagging. Three GBPs re-labeled to Cell Thesis. Review-request automation firing at the "shown + billed" event. Consistent monthly volume across all three doors.
Paid acquisition Meta running. Google mostly dormant. LSA/Local Services Ads absent. Retargeting light. Meta continues at scale under new identity. Google Search + LSA + Performance Max covering local intent. Retargeting keyed to booking-funnel stage.
Lifecycle & retention One-off email blasts. No treatment-cycle flow. No membership monetization on injectables cadence. Welcome flow, treatment-cycle replenishment flow, lapsed-patient reactivation. Optional membership tier layered on high-frequency treatments.
Positioning "Aging gracefully is overrated." Anti-aging tilt within med-aesthetics. Sits alongside every other NYC med spa. Cellular · Preventive · Performance. Longevity register at the front, aesthetics as the treatment expression. Fewer competitors at the top of the funnel.
Operator visibility Roman leads the team page. Founder story present but not paid-forward as authority. Founder-led authority content (short-form, one channel at a time). Longevity/aesthetics thesis in the operator's own voice.
§06 · The Anchor

Your three priorities — run as systems, not tasks.

You already named the shape of the first ninety days in your reply. This is our reading of what "done" looks like on each — and why they have to sequence in this order.

Priority I

Growth ROI dashboard + workflow lock

One live view that shows, per location, per channel: spend, sessions, booked consults, shown consults, treatments performed, revenue, and gross margin. Not five dashboards. One. Warehoused in the tool you already trust, refreshed daily, with an anomaly detector on the top three metrics.

Maps to §14 Measurement
Priority II

Pixel & identity migration under new brand

Migrate — don't rebuild — the Meta and Google pixels, custom audiences, and event history from manhattan-laser.com to cellthesis.com. Re-attribute conversions cleanly. Preserve the twenty-four months of learning; append the new brand identity instead of overwriting it.

Maps to §15 Pixel Migration
Priority III

Lifecycle marketing engine

The three flows that turn a first laser booking into a treatment cycle, a treatment cycle into a membership, and a lapsed patient back into a shown consult. Built in your GHL instance, keyed to real events (booked / shown / treated / lapsed), with founder-voice copy that reads like Cell Thesis — not template.

Maps to §12 Lifecycle

Priority I answers the question "is this working?" — you cannot pressure-test priorities II and III without it. Priority II answers "did we bring the audience with us?" — you cannot scale under the new brand without it. Priority III answers "do our patients come back?" — the LTV question that governs the whole model.

§07 · The buyer, three ways

One clinic. Three patient economics.

The consolidation only works if the buyer segmentation is honest. These are the three actual patients — different acquisition costs, different lifetime values, different sequences.

Persona I · The First-Timer

The 20%-off laser trial

Late 20s to early 40s, NYC-local, price-sensitive on the first visit, browses via Instagram and Google Maps, books via the promo pill on the site or a Meta ad. First-treatment CAC is real; the whole model depends on the second visit.

Job to be done: get shown, love it, come back within 60 days.
Persona II · The Regular

The injectables cadence

Mid-30s to mid-50s, higher AOV, treatment cycles run at natural biological cadence (roughly quarterly on toxins, semi-annual on fillers). Books directly, reschedules on-site, opens SMS, opens email. Where the practice compounds. Most under-monetized: no membership, no cycle-based reminder economics.

Job to be done: never miss the cycle window. Ever.
Persona III · The Longevity Buyer

The performance patient

35-plus, higher household income, walking in via wellness & longevity — bloodwork, IV drip, peptide, hormone, PRP hair, biological-age testing if you offer it. Higher intent, longer consideration, LTV several multiples above the laser first-timer. Reads before booking. Wants a founder voice.

Job to be done: earn a discovery-call consult on clinical credibility, not price.
§08 · The Method

The five-step process — applied to a rebrand-under-load.

AYMI runs every engagement through the same five steps. On a consolidation like Cell Thesis, the steps look like this:

Discovery

Audit the three existing surfaces, the current pixel state, the GBP inventory, the review stack, and the historic ad performance. Interview the team on the friction they see.

Strategy

Sequence the migration. Choose which channels lead. Define target CPAs per persona and per location. Lock the dashboard schema.

Creative

Build the launch assets in the Cell Thesis register: Meta creative for each persona, founder-led long-form for the longevity buyer, GBP media refresh.

Launch

Coordinated same-day: pixel migration, domain flip, GBP updates, ad-account rename, welcome flow arm. Nothing dark for more than an hour.

Optimize

Weekly performance rhythm. Monthly strategy review. Anomaly alerts on the dashboard. Quarterly cadence for the founder-authority pipeline.

§09 · Meta — what we see in the wild & what we change

The ad account is a working muscle. Don't reset the reps.

You're already running Meta. That's the good news and the risk. Live paid delivery is your best pixel data, and it's also what gets casually erased in a "let's just start fresh under the new brand" moment.

What we see in the wild

  • Business Manager under manhattan-laser.com with roughly 24 months of pixel history.
  • Creative running against a promo-led hook ("20% off first treatment").
  • Instagram @manhattan_laser doing the audience work; @cell_thesis to be provisioned.
  • Retargeting present but not layered by treatment interest or location.
  • No visible pixel event coverage for shown-and-treated, only for booked.

What we change

  • Rename the ad account and re-attribute the pixel to cellthesis.com without breaking event history.
  • Segment audiences into three lookalikes: first-time laser, regular injectables, longevity buyer.
  • Layer server-side CAPI on booked, shown, and treated events out of GHL.
  • Refresh creative to the Cell Thesis register — clinical-lifestyle, no patient faces, identity-neutral.
  • Move retargeting from "site visitor" to "started booking / abandoned" for real intent recovery.

First 90 days

  • Day 1–14: pixel and audience audit, CAPI wiring plan, creative brief for launch pack.
  • Day 15–30: pixel re-parenting, first Cell Thesis creative live, ad-account cutover.
  • Day 31–60: audience segmentation launched, retargeting rebuilt, first cost-per-shown reads.
  • Day 61–90: scale winners at the persona level, kill losers at the ad-set level, prep month-4 test plan.
§10 · Google & Local — the underdefended gap

Three doors, three review pages, three sources of local intent.

Local intent for laser, injectables, and wellness in NYC is enormous, and largely uncaptured on your side of the ledger. The three Google Business Profiles are the biggest under-monetized asset in the current stack.

What we see in the wild

  • Three GBP listings: Midtown, UES, Brooklyn. Different review counts, no unified review strategy.
  • Google Ads presence is thin. Local Services Ads absent for injectables/wellness verticals eligible in NYC.
  • Direct-brand search traffic dominant; non-brand local terms (e.g. "laser hair removal midtown," "botox upper east side") ceded to competitors.
  • GBP posts irregular. Photos on GBP haven't matched the current interior refresh.

What we change

  • GBP consolidation and rebrand — same GBP records, updated identity, don't lose the review authority.
  • Automated review request keyed to the "billed & shown" event out of GHL.
  • Non-brand Search: three geo-scoped campaigns targeting the three neighborhoods.
  • Local Services Ads onboarding where eligible; badge earned first, then bid.
  • GBP posts on a weekly cadence — treatment features, staff spotlights, seasonal offers.

First 90 days

  • Day 1–14: GBP audit + verification of ownership + review inventory.
  • Day 15–30: brand migration on all three profiles, photo refresh, LSA onboarding.
  • Day 31–60: non-brand geo campaigns launched, review automation firing.
  • Day 61–90: first read on local ranking shifts, geo-CAC deltas, LSA lead quality.
§11 · SEO & Content — building the longevity register

The rebrand is a permission slip to talk about longevity.

Manhattan Laser could only talk about aesthetics. Cell Thesis can talk about cellular health, prevention, performance, hormone optimization, sleep, recovery — the full frame that patient III is actually shopping for. That's a content unlock, not a color palette unlock.

What we see in the wild

  • Site content organized by treatment (laser, injectables, facials). Standard med-spa taxonomy.
  • No editorial layer. No founder voice. No condition-led content ("what to do about melasma," "how injectables work at 40 vs 50").
  • Blog effectively absent. Longevity content — where the highest-LTV patient is searching — completely open.

What we change

  • Editorial pillar: cellular · preventive · performance. Twenty-four seed pieces mapped to real search demand.
  • Founder-led long-form on the longevity thesis — Roman's operator voice, ghost-drafted, quarterly cadence.
  • Location + condition pages ("laser hair removal Midtown NYC," "peptides for recovery Brooklyn").
  • Schema markup: MedicalBusiness, MedicalProcedure, LocalBusiness, and Speakable — for AEO/GEO visibility on longevity queries.

First 90 days

  • Day 1–14: content audit and pillar map. Founder interview session for voice capture.
  • Day 15–30: seed content batch (10 pieces) drafted and staged for launch alongside the domain flip.
  • Day 31–60: publication cadence live. First longevity pillar essay from Roman.
  • Day 61–90: rankings baseline set; first non-brand organic sessions read.
§12 · Lifecycle — email, SMS, memberships

The place your model finally becomes a subscription.

Aesthetics done well is the replenishment business. Toxins cycle. Fillers cycle. Laser hair removal courses. IV drips renew. What Manhattan Laser doesn't have — a lifecycle engine — is exactly what turns the three locations into a compounding book. Priority III in your reply is our priority III in the build.

What we see in the wild

  • GHL provisioned. Not fully wired. No structured event triggers on treatment cycles.
  • Occasional broadcasts. No welcome flow, no post-treatment nurture, no membership tier.
  • SMS underused despite being the highest-CTR channel for the injectables cadence patient.

What we change

  • Welcome flow — 4 touches over the first 30 days after the first booking (educate the treatment, set the rebook, seed reviews, tease Cell Thesis's fuller stack).
  • Treatment-cycle replenishment — timed to the biological cadence of the treatment (weeks 10–14 for toxins, months 5–7 for fillers, month 3 for laser). SMS-first, email backup.
  • Lapsed patient reactivation — automatic at 180 days no-book, founder-voice, no discount unless the patient asks for it.
  • Membership offer for the injectables regular — cadence-locked, priced above the promo, positioned as the "belong to the practice" tier.

First 90 days

  • Day 1–14: GHL audit + event schema design + brand voice capture for lifecycle copy.
  • Day 15–30: welcome flow live + review request live.
  • Day 31–60: treatment-cycle flow live per treatment category. First replenishment revenue attributed.
  • Day 61–90: lapsed-patient flow live. Membership tier soft-launched at Midtown before rolling to UES + Brooklyn.
§13 · CRO & Booking — where GHL earns its keep

Your booking funnel is the highest-leverage surface in the whole system.

Every dollar of Meta and Google is judged at the moment a patient chooses to click "book." A four-percent lift in booking-page conversion is worth more than a four-percent drop in CPC. That's the whole game on paid.

What we see in the wild

  • Booking page routes through GHL. Multi-step. Not location-optimized (Bay Ridge users routed to a generic form).
  • No per-treatment intent capture (someone booking laser lands in the same funnel as someone booking a longevity discovery call — different economics, same UX).
  • SMS confirmation exists. Rebook prompt inconsistent.
  • No abandoned-booking recovery (someone who starts and doesn't finish never hears back).

What we change

  • Location- and treatment-aware routing — three sub-funnels, one visual system.
  • Persona intake capture on the booking form — for the segmentation model, not to gate the booking.
  • Abandoned-booking SMS at 30 minutes; email at 24 hours; the founder-voice text at 72.
  • Rebook prompt at treatment completion — one tap, cycle-window pre-selected.
  • Instrumentation: booked / shown / treated / rebooked as clean events pushed to Meta CAPI + Google Enhanced Conversions + the ROI dashboard.

First 90 days

  • Day 1–14: full funnel audit. Baseline conversion rates by treatment, by location, by device.
  • Day 15–30: sub-funnel routing live. Abandoned-booking recovery flows firing.
  • Day 31–60: intake capture live. Rebook prompt live. First conversion-rate lift measured.
  • Day 61–90: enhanced conversion signals flowing to Meta + Google. Attribution loop closed.
§14 · Measurement — Priority I in build

The dashboard is the deliverable.

You called it "target growth ROI metrics + workflows." We call it "the one view that lets you fire an underperforming channel with confidence." Same idea. Everything else in the engagement is judged against what this dashboard reports.

What the dashboard shows, per week, per location

  • Ad spend by channel (Meta / Google / LSA / other).
  • Sessions, split into brand and non-brand.
  • Booked consults / shown consults / treated consults.
  • Cost-per-booked-consult, cost-per-shown-consult, cost-per-first-treatment.
  • Revenue attributed by first-touch channel and last-touch channel (both, side-by-side — LTVs disagree, on purpose).
  • Repeat-visit rate at 30/60/90.
  • Membership acquisition rate (once live).
  • Gross margin per acquired patient — the number that governs how hard we push spend.

What the dashboard eliminates

  • Manual reconciliation of Meta spend against GHL booking log.
  • The "how did July compare to June" question that currently takes an hour of spreadsheet time.
  • The invisible waste that hides between ad-account-level ROAS and clinic-level P&L.
  • The temptation to judge a channel on a two-week window when the treatment cycle is ten.

Refresh cadence

  • Daily automated refresh from the source systems.
  • Anomaly alerts on spend, CPA, and repeat rate.
  • Weekly review call. Monthly strategy call. Quarterly LTV recalibration.
§15 · Pixel Identity Migration — Priority II in build

Bring the twenty-four months with you.

This is the single riskiest technical maneuver of the launch and, done properly, one of the cleanest wins available. The Meta and Google pixels have been collecting event data under manhattan-laser.com for two years. That data is portable — but only if the migration is scripted, not improvised.

What we preserve

  • Meta Pixel event history (page views, add-to-cart-equivalent booking actions, lead events).
  • Custom audiences built off that history — website visitors, engagers, high-intent segments.
  • Lookalike audiences already seeded off the customer file.
  • Google Analytics history and Google Ads conversion data.
  • Server-side event history via CAPI, if configured.
  • The learning phase status of every campaign — a hard-won asset most rebrands vaporize.

How we sequence the flip

  • Week 1: audit + document the current pixel + audience + campaign state. Snapshot every custom audience.
  • Week 2: stage cellthesis.com with pixel firing in parallel — dual-firing while manhattan-laser.com still redirects to the old surface.
  • Week 3: domain flip. Redirects 301 everywhere. Pixel base code updated but retains the pixel ID.
  • Week 4: audience validation. Confirm every custom audience still populates. Confirm CAPI still fires on all events.
  • Ongoing: re-attribute historical conversions from Manhattan Laser to Cell Thesis for LTV modeling.

Nothing in this section is "creative work." All of it is technical hygiene that separates a rebrand that keeps its audience from a rebrand that starts over. The cost of doing it right is small. The cost of doing it wrong is the entire twenty-four months.

§16 · The 90-day sprint

What ships, in order.

Days 1–14 — Audit & Sequence

Foundation set
  • Full audit: pixel, GBP, GHL, ad accounts, review inventory.
  • Dashboard schema locked with Roman.
  • Cell Thesis brand voice + register captured (founder interview).
  • Creative brief for launch pack drafted.
  • Migration runbook written & approved.

Days 15–30 — Migrate & Wire

The launch window
  • Domain flip + pixel re-parenting.
  • GBPs rebranded across all three locations.
  • First Cell Thesis creative live on Meta.
  • Welcome flow + review-request flow arm in GHL.
  • Dashboard v1 published, live daily.

Days 31–60 — Activate & Layer

Multi-channel activation
  • Google non-brand geo campaigns launched.
  • LSA onboarded where eligible.
  • Treatment-cycle replenishment flow live.
  • Booking funnel sub-routes deployed.
  • Seed content batch published (10 pieces).

Days 61–90 — Compound & Scale

System steady-state
  • Lapsed-patient reactivation live.
  • Membership tier soft-launched at Midtown.
  • First founder-led longevity essay published.
  • Meta scaling on winning persona segments.
  • Q2 plan built off Q1 dashboard data.
§17 · Engagement Shapes

Three shapes. One recommended.

These are the three shapes an AYMI engagement can take for Cell Thesis. The investment for each is held for the scoping call — we'd rather decide together what's in scope first, then price it once the answer is real.

ShapeTeamAI DashboardBest fit
Foundation 1 strategist You want the migration executed cleanly and lifecycle running, but you'll own paid + Google in-house.
★ RECOMMENDEDGrowth System 1 strategist + paid lead Included You want the migration, the dashboard, paid acquisition (Meta + Google + LSA), and the lifecycle engine, all run as one system.
Full Longevity OS 2 strategists + creative lead + paid lead Included, plus founder-authority pipeline You want the above plus a founder-content engine (Roman as the operator voice for longevity) and the runway to build the membership + IV/hormone/regen expansion as a full growth org.
The investment for each is held for the scoping call — we'd rather decide together what's in scope first, then price it once the answer is real. Media spend, software, and any creator/production fees are pass-through, billed separately from the retainer.
§18 · Proof

Three engagements that share the mechanics.

These are AYMI case studies chosen for structural fit — multi-location acquisition, subscription lifecycle, and specialty patient economics.

Multi-location healthcare

Behavioral Health Network

  • New-patient intakes+260%
  • Cost per booked intake−44%
  • Organic sessions+315%
  • Insurance-verified bookings+68%

Why this maps: multi-state, multi-location behavioral-health platform running a rebrand-adjacent acquisition system. Closest structural match to a three-clinic roll-up under one brand.

Multi-location practice acquisition

Regional Psychology Group

  • Booked initial consults+240%
  • New-provider caseload fill+90%
  • Cost per booked consult−39%
  • Organic specialty leads+280%

Why this maps: the operating answer to "how does the next chair fill?" — provider-matching engine across specialty SEO + content + intent paid. Directly applicable to filling the three location schedules under Cell Thesis.

Retention & subscription lifecycle

Nutrafol

  • Recurring revenue+320%
  • Retention+58%
  • Marketing ROI4.2×
  • Cancel rate month 3−28%

Why this maps: cycle-based replenishment economics, practitioner-endorsed authority, and the LTV thesis that governs any aesthetics or longevity treatment cadence. The Priority III blueprint.

§19 · Recommendation

Growth System, from day one.

The Foundation tier could technically deliver the migration cleanly. But once the pixels are re-parented, the immediate next question — "what should we do with all this preserved audience?" — needs paid muscle that Foundation doesn't include. Waiting a quarter to add paid is a quarter of the compounding you'd otherwise get.

The Full Longevity OS is right if you want to build a founder-authority pipeline in Roman's voice from day one — a serious lever for the highest-LTV persona — and if the membership + IV/hormone/regen expansion is already scoped. If those are Q2 questions, not Q1 questions, Full Longevity OS is early.

Growth System ★ is the shape that matches your three named priorities and the timing of the rebrand. It ships the migration, the dashboard, paid acquisition across Meta + Google + LSA, and the lifecycle engine in the same ninety days — the sequencing the anchor recommendation lays out. It's the smallest engagement that answers all three of your priorities cleanly.

The investment sits in the middle of the ladder. It's held for the scoping call.

§20 · Open items for the scoping call

Twelve things we'd rather hear from you than guess at.

01
Cell Thesis positioning: is the intent to lead with longevity/regen and let aesthetics ride underneath, or to keep aesthetics the front door and let longevity earn a separate lane?
02
Current monthly ad spend, by channel, blended across the three locations — so we can size the migration risk honestly and set target CPAs against real baselines.
03
Meta Business Manager access + Google Ads access — read-only is fine for the audit, admin needed for the migration.
04
GHL admin access, and a walk-through of the current booking + patient event schema.
05
Domain flip date — the ninety-day plan is anchored to it and every subsequent milestone slides with it.
06
Cell Thesis brand guidelines — logo, palette, voice — if in flight; if not, that's a scope item we'd fold in.
07
Membership pricing and structure intent, if any is drafted. If not, we'd co-design it with your team.
08
Longevity/wellness service line — how much of the current mix, what's in the roadmap (peptides, hormone, IV, regen)?
09
Any existing agency or freelance relationships in flight — so we sequence around rather than through.
10
Compliance credentialing for the new brand — LegitScripts, Meta health-vertical certification for any Rx-adjacent services, and the credentials the site presents.
11
Roman's public voice appetite — how much on-camera / long-form / social presence is realistic given operator load?
12
Success metric for the ninety days — one number you'd want to hit that would make the engagement obviously worth it. We'll pressure-test it, then commit to it.
§21 · Close

Consolidation done right compounds. Done fast, it resets.

The rebrand from Manhattan Laser to Cell Thesis is the single largest surface change your practice will make in the next five years. It's also the single largest opportunity — if the migration runs cleanly and the measurement layer arrives on the same day. Talk in the next few days.

Book the scoping call →